Merit Messenger
Search amulets...
← Back to news
Thai Amulet Dealer Denies Swapping Rare Luang Phor Tim Gold Coin

Thai Amulet Dealer Denies Swapping Rare Luang Phor Tim Gold Coin

A prominent Bangkok appraiser is accused of swapping a customer's rare gold Luang Phor Tim coin, worth up to 9 million baht, during authentication, sparking debate over verification safeguards in Thailand's amulet trade.


A prominent Bangkok amulet dealer publicly denied accusations that he swapped a customer's rare gold coin amulet during an authentication check, in a Facebook livestream on August 11, 2026, that has become one of the most-discussed controversies in Thailand's amulet trade this year. The dealer, known in the trade as Pot Thaphrachan (พจน์ ท่าพระจันทร์), runs a well-known amulet appraisal and rental shop on Lat Phrao Road in Bangkok. The dispute centers on a rare gold, enamel-inlaid "8th Cycle" Sema coin (เหรียญเสมา 8 รอบ เนื้อทองคำลงยา) attributed to the revered monk Luang Phor Tim of Wat Laharnrai — one of the most sought-after amulet series in the country.

What Happened

According to Thai outlets Khaosod, Workpoint News, and LINE TODAY, a woman in her sixties brought a set of 14 family amulets to Pot's shop on or around August 5 to have them appraised, with the full set initially valued at roughly 2.5 million baht. Staff at the shop opened the casing of the gold Sema coin to test its gold content, then told the customer the piece "was not gold." When she had the coin re-examined by another appraiser, she was told it no longer appeared to be the same coin she had submitted. A Facebook page called "เหยื่อ" ("Victim") went public with the allegations, naming Pot directly and triggering a wave of criticism across amulet-collector social media.

In his livestream, Pot denied personally swapping the coin, saying it had been "left behind and mixed up" inside the gold-testing machine due to a staff error, not deliberate substitution. He apologized to the customer, said the employee involved had been suspended, and pledged to overhaul the shop's internal verification procedures. What fueled further suspicion, however, was the price gap: the whole 14-piece set was originally quoted at 2.5 million baht, yet the shop later offered as much as 9 million baht for the single disputed coin alone — a jump that left many collectors asking whether the coin's true value had been understated at first.

Why the Luang Phor Tim "8th Cycle" Coin Matters

Luang Phor Tim Attasilo of Wat Laharnrai in Rayong province is one of modern Thailand's most revered amulet masters, best known for his Khun Paen amulets and protective talismans made with traditional sacred formulas. Our guide to Luang Phor Tim's amulets from Wat Laharnrai covers his legacy in depth. The 1975 (B.E. 2518) "8th Cycle" Sema coin series is among the most valuable in his output: standard copper editions already trade for hundreds of thousands of baht, while rare gold, enamel-inlaid pieces are considered blue-chip items commanding prices in the millions. Because Luang Phor Tim pieces sit at the very top of the Thai amulet market, any credible allegation of tampering during authentication ripples far beyond one transaction.

What This Means for Overseas Collectors

This is not the first authentication-related scandal to rock the Thai amulet trade this year; it follows an earlier case involving nine well-known appraisers and a 300-million-baht debt dispute over swapped amulets. For overseas buyers, the case is a reminder of three basic safeguards. First, always photograph or video every piece before handing it over for appraisal or gold-testing, and insist on an itemized written receipt. Second, favor amulets that carry a verifiable Samakom Phra certification number that can be checked against an official registry, rather than relying solely on a single appraiser's verbal opinion. Third, for top-tier lineage masters like those catalogued in our guide to Thailand's Nine Great Monks, seek a second independent opinion before any transaction above a few hundred thousand baht.

As of this writing, neither side has publicly agreed on compensation or a final account of events. We will continue to follow developments in this story.

Source: LINE TODAY (via Workpoint News 23)

Explore the Encyclopedia